Here is another fuller account by scientist Tom Bearden regarding
the 1986 downing of the Challenger by Soviet Scalar Interferometers.
An early account of the new disaster reported that "two
objects" were seen traveling along with the shuttle. What were
those? Could they have been the marker beacons of a scalar
Destruction of the Challenger in January 1986
As the whole world knows, on January 28, 1986 the shuttle
Challenger was launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida after exposure to
undesirable weather conditions, and disastrously exploded shortly
after launch. The evidence seems to indicate that, as the rising
vehicle was stressed, one end of its right booster broke loose,
twisting away and into the main fuel tank, causing rupture, spillage
of the fuel and catastrophic explosion. Several other anomalies still
exist, however, and it is clear that a problem existed with at least
one of the booster seals. All seven astronauts aboard the flight were
killed in the fiery destruction of the vehicle.
Of course no one had recognized that the Soviets had already tested
a launch-phase anti-ballistic missile (LPABM) system against three of
our previous shuttle launches. These "wet-runs" used a
deliberate "time offset" to delay the explosive emergence of
electromagnetic energy in a launched shuttle's location along its
trajectory. The delayed test shots resulted in very large
"booms" above the launch site after the shuttle was safely
out of the area, but did not destroy the shuttle vehicles themselves.
For example, the delayed-shot boom occurred 12 minutes after the
evening launch of Nov. 26, 1985. Even a marker beacon (large light in
the sky) was utilized on that launch shortly after lift-off. The
marker beacon was photographed. In addition, another photograph taken
in a time sequence shows another sudden streak of light coming down
and ending in a burst of light. This was probably a spatially-offset
test of the "pulse" mode for destroying the shuttle. The
"light burst" would have been detected in the Soviet Union
and scored against its intended offset position. However, another
mechanism may have been used to cause destruction of the shuttle
On Jan. 1, 1986 the presence of a metal-softening signal added on
to the Soviet LPABM system's scalar EM transmissions was detected by a
surprised Frank Golden. The metal-softening ability of the detected
signal was experimentally verified by him. Golden also locally
nullified the action of the scalar EM signal in a test, rather
conclusively establishing (1) that it existed and (2) what it was. The
signal was apparently being prepared for use against an upcoming U.S.
Just prior to the launch of the shuttle in late January, 1986, the
Soviets accomplished significant weather engineering over the U.S. The
jet stream was severely bent southward in the middle of the U.S.,
bending rightward again to move across the Florida panhandle. Icy cold
air from Canada was drawn far down, into Florida and onto the
Challenger sitting on its launch pad. This exposure to cold outside
its tested range was probably an additional factor contributing to the
Challenger's failure. Positive signatures of the Soviet weather
engineering and jet stream manipulation were observed and photographed
by several persons, particularly in Alabama and California.
On January 28, 1986, the Soviet scalar EM weapon system effects
were sharply localized in the launch zone. Localization involved
higher frequencies being present; these are quite painful to small
brains -- whose hemispheres act as a scalar interferometer and
detector -- such as in birds. As commented upon by national news
commentators, strangely the birds were not flying that morning.
Indeed, they were staying down on the ground or avoiding the area,
since the sky over the area was painful to them.
As the Challenger rose, the metal-softening signal would have been
experienced in and around the boosters shortly after ignition, since
the booster flame acts as a special "ion-plasma"
turner/detector for the scalar signal. (Certain plasmas have a unique
characteristic: they transform an input transverse wave to a
longitudinal wave, or an input longitudinal wave to a transverse
wave.) The effect of such a local signal is to "change mass in
the immediate vicinity" with the particular scalar resonance
signal. (Mass acts as a capacitance or accumulator for scalar
The ill-fated Challenger was doomed. After ignition, the booster
flame acted as a ionic plasma detector/amplifier for the scalar
metal-softening signal on the Soviet Woodpecker grid. The metal in and
around the booster flame was slowly and steadily weakening due to
charge-up with the metal-softening pattern. This contributed to
booster leakage from the already cold-damaged seal. The leaking
booster poured out smoke and later flame, contributing to the
Substantial winds and air turbulence over the site increased the
stress on the Challenger as it rose through this region. This also
contributed to the impending disaster and may have been deliberately
created there by Soviet weather engineering.
As the Challenger stressed, eventually one or more weakened metal
mounts gave way, partially freeing the end of the right booster. The
booster oscillated, rotating into the tank and rupturing it. Contact
of the escaping liquid fuel and the flame resulted in a fiery
explosion, destroying the vehicle.
Even so another anomalous flame or light was observed on the
vehicle, and may have represented a very small additional "pulse
mode energy form" produced by the Soviet weapon that was
attacking the Challenger. The shock of the explosion probably killed
the astronauts instantly, although the cabin appears to have remained
essentially intact while it plunged several miles to the ocean below.
By creating excess cold exposure to the shuttle, inducing
metal-softening in and around the ignited booster, and possible adding
a deliberate "intensely hot spot", the Soviets caused the
Challenger to weaken and destroy itself shortly after launch, in so
subtle a fashion that NASA scientists would not suspect what had
actually caused the mishap. The Soviets also had previously withdrawn
all their trawlers and ships which normally shadow a shuttle launch.
to prevent any suggestion of Soviet presence near or involvement in
the catastrophic accident.
A few days later, sporadically intense "high frequency
localization signals" were still present on the grid, at least at
one hinge-point at Birmingham, Alabama. From 1-4 February 1986, many
birds inadvertently flew into the zone when an intense breakout of
these components occurred, and dead birds fell from the sky in
According to an Urgentgram sent out by General D. Graham, on the
evening of the Challenger's loss, KGB headquarters held a party to
celebrate 'success of their active measure against the shuttle.' Note
that all Soviet scalar EM weapons -- development, testing, deployment,
and usage -- is under command and control of the KGB.
Among other things, this briefing details the bizarre series of
indicators that showed the Soviet intention to destroy the vehicle,
and documents the accidental discovery of the signal with which they
intended to cause the shuttle to fail and destroy itself.